The optical redshifts were obtained using the Double Spectrograph (Oke & Gunn 1982) on the 5 m Hale Telescope at Palomar
Observatory
We followed routine IRAF reduction procedures to extract the redshift data from our spectra. Bad pixels and cosmic-ray
hits were removed from the spectra by replacement with averages of the nearest neighbor pixel values. Standard star and
source spectra were flat-fielded with spectra of the telescope dome illuminated by incandescent lights. Background
illumination was removed from red and blue spectra by subtracting a linear fit to the emission on either side of the
nuclear continuum emission The wavelength scale was calibrated using discharge lamp spectra taken after each exposure on an
IRAS NEPR source. Sensitivity calibration was performed using short (2-5 s) exposures on the standard stars BD +
17"4708 and BD +26° 2606 (Oke & Gunn 1983). The spectra were then compressed to one-dimensional format.
Some NEPR galaxies were found to have more than one optical component within the 45" positional errors presented by Hacking
& Houck (1987). These are marked in Table 2 with the notation N. S. E, or W to indicate the offset direction from the
IRAS source positions. We aligned the Double Spectrograph slit to include multiple sources when possible and thus acquire
redshifts for two sources in a single exposure. In most eases such multiple sources were found to be at similar if not
identical redshifts (17514+6534 NW and SE are exceptions). Thus, out of 80 exposures taken, we extracted a total of 88
spectra. In all, spectra were obtained for 77 of the 99 NEPR sample sources. One of these (F18066+6632) was analyzed in
Ashby, Houck, & Hacking (1992).
Emission line positions were extracted and identified from red and blue spectra for each galaxy observed. We present
redshifts only for those sources for which we could make more than one line identification (in several cases, especially
for the companion galaxies but also for five isolated objects, it was not possible to make corroborating line
identifications). These ``weak" sources are marked with ellipses in Table 2 and will not be considered further in this
paper. We note for the sake of completeness only the borderline case 18096 + 6734 (3-89), which has weak (3
Redshift data for the 76 NEPR sources are presented in Table 2. The redshift error is typically
on two separate
occasions. The majority of the data were collected on the nights of 1987 June 23-28 by P. B. H., J. R. H., and
B. T. S. More spectra were collected over the period 1990 June 23-28 by M. L. N. A., P. B. H., and J. R. H. In
both cases the Double Spectrograph was configured with a dichroic/beamsplitter to provide spectral coverage over the region
3800 Å to 10,000 Å. The 158 lines mm-1 and 300 lines mm-1 gratings were used in the red and blue cameras,
respectively, yielding resolution of roughly 6 Å per pixel at H
and 3 Å per pixel at H
. All
observations were made through a 1" slit. Exposure lengths varied from 300 s to 1200 s. Atmospheric seeing during the
observations was generally between 1" and 2" FWHM. The sample is tabulated and the observations are summarized in Table 1.
)
features consistent with [O II]
3727 emission and Ho absorption at a redshift of z = 0.029, but because it lacks
Ha or any other emission features longward of 5500 A we choose to treat its redshift as undetermined. In addition, 17479 +
6735 (3-02) has a strong continuum with zero redshift Balmer decrement absorption lines and no detectable emission lines.
We conclude from this and the fact that the 25-60
m color for 17479 + 6735 is indicative of a galaxy that we have
observed the wrong object. Finally, 3-52 is NGC 6543, a bright planetary nebula. Thus, we are left with a sample of 76
sources for which redshifts have been determined.
. A histogram of the redshift distribution is presented in Figure 2 below. The median
sample redshift is z = 0.080.
Galaxy Hacking Position Date Time Galaxy Hacking Position Date Time
(1987) (1950) Observed (s) (1987) (1950) Observed (s)
Next: Analysis
Up: Massive Supercluster and Starburst Evolution
Previous: Introduction
Feedback: mail Eric Home: Eric's Home Page
Mon Jan 13 09:44:57 EST 1997